Notes On: August Recap, Celeb Breakups, Parasocial Relationships, And 'Everything Is The Same'
Your second newsletter today, because what can I say? I love autumn.
Dear Noters,
August was supposed to be a cinematic montage of white wine and sunsets. Of pizzas on the beach, sand sifting through bare toes, the landscape melting like wet paint over a glittering sea. But it didnât quite end up like that.
As with most things in life, this August contained multitudes. Listening to breaking news updates and reading first person pieces as my feeds were flooded with violence: racist rioting, fires on streets, terrorists infiltrating a security system designed to protect women.
And yet, only a few days later, I was standing amidst a crowd of girls and women, screaming âFuck the patriarchyâ at the top of our lungs, adorned in glitter and beads, a kind of defiant fearlessness streaking our cheeks, leaving trails of confetti in our wake. These were the stand-out moments: the lows; the highs.
But the in-between? Ever-present clouds; lukewarm days. Getting up early to go to the gym before work. Watching Love Is Blind. Voice noting friends. Conversations about nail colours, and Molly-Mae, and orange wine. Another month spent finding the glimmer amidst the everyday, trying to find the montage in my reality. Lots of greyish days, splattered with specks of gold. Kind of like a painting, I like to think.
For the newcomers: welcome. This newsletter is intended to be read in a very specific way: with your Sunday morning coffee. Itâs a snapshot from my Notes App (thoughts on pop culture and society and romanticising and everything in-between) structured in an anagram of âNotesâ: N is for Noteworthy, O is for obsessing, T for texts, E for educated by and S for saved. I hope you love it.
Noteworthy
Sweeter Than Fiction: Why You Donât Need To Break Up With Your Boyfriend!!!
In news that shocked the entire world and evaded no-one (except, perhaps, anyone who isnât chronically online), Molly-Mae and Tommy of Love Island fame (aka The Kardashians of the UK) announced their break-up via Instagram, this month.
Itâs been wildly speculated that Tommy Fury cheated on Molly-Mae, but Iâm not here to talk about rumours. What I am here to talk about, though, is why everyone cares so much.
I guarantee you that youâll have either been part of â or privy to â the following conversation, at some point in the last few years:
Friend 1: Omg, have you seen?
Friend 2: What?
Friend 1: [insert celebrity couple here] just broke up.
Friend 2: WHAT??? How do you know?
Friend 1: She just posted on ig.
Friend 2: [sends piece/shows the post]
Friend 1: Oh my god.
Friend 2: I know.
Friend 1: I didnât think theyâd ever break up?
Friend 2: I know, I literally canât believe it.
And then, the sentence that reverberates in every single one of these conversations: I genuinely donât think Iâll ever believe in love again??
A celebrity breakup unleashes a phenomenon Iâm going to call: Parasocial Relationships On Crack. Why? Partly because it involves two people (double the parasocial); and partly because itâs about a relationship.
Max Balegde made a hilarious (and probably accurate) prediction after Molly-Mae and Tommy Fury announced their break-up: âI donât think people understand the severity of how this is going to impact society. Think about it: Molly-Mae has created a generation of girlies who like a slicked-back bun, a fiat 500, theyâve got a nude lip on and the most Flawless fake-tan that youâve ever seen in your life, and every single one of them right there is sitting there thinking: Molly and Tommy have broke up, maybe Tom, or Liam, who Iâm with, right now, who works in recruitment, maybe thereâs flaws in our relationship. If it could happen to them, it could happen to me! [âŠ] 90% of those are likely to break up over winter.â
Heâs being funny; itâs not a serious video. And yet. Heâs not wrong. This is what happens when celebrities break up: it sends the rest of us spiralling. Â
After JLo and Ben Affleck announced their divorce last week, a slew of tweets clogged our feeds about what this ultimately means about whether or not you should âget back together with an exâ:
We put so much belief in these relationships: itâs as though we store all our hopes, our dreams, in the arms of those we idolise, partly because we know that fairy tales arenât real.
We no longer watch â or believe in â the rom-coms we grew up with. Edward Cullen was actually quite abusive; Blair and Chuck werenât romantic, they were toxic, and donât get me started on Romeo and Juliet (teenagers killing themselves over a fleeting crush? Come on!).
Even if youâre surrounded by the kind of romantic love that seems to have been âwritten by a womanâ (your sister and her husband; your parents, or grandparents, even your own relationship), you will also most-likely be privy to the realities of romantic love. Miscommunication. Boredom. The âseven-year itch.â When romance slips from flitting butterflies to bickering over the âcorrectâ way to cut the butter.
For me â and for lots of people, I think â these things, the quotidian, are a part of the romance; they exemplify true comfort, which is synonymous with true love. They donât dazzle on screens. They are not the stuff of (most) poetry. Theyâre for the muted emotions; the buttered-toast mornings.
But itâs easy to be dazzled by the dazzling; by A Listers performing love with red-carpet interactions. Itâs so alluring partly because it leaves so much to the imagination: we are forced to fill in the gaps. Itâs even better than fiction; a true-life fairy-tale love. Â Â
And thereâs often an element of art wrapped in reality, too, which only deepens parasocial obsessions.
Taylor Swift wrote some of the most romantic lyrics of all time about her ex, Joe Alwyn: âyou are the one I have been waiting for / king of my heart,â and âI would give you my wild, give you a childâ and âallâs well that ends well to end up with you.â Stormzy wrote of Maya: âMy miracle / my happy place / my heart and soul / forever yours.â JLo released a whole film about the depth â and truth â of her relationship with Ben Affleck (âactually, true love does exist, and some things are forever [âŠ] Donât give upâ).
When art is tied to (romanticised) reality, and that reality changes, the audience is left with shock, followed by that terrifying, unanswered question: Is love real?
But one thing we often forget about celebrity break-ups? There are more than two people in them.
Because there, too, is the public: the watchful eye, the third-wheel.
And thatâs why â according to OâCallaghan, quoted in Cosmopolitan UK â celebrity relationships are statistically more likely to fail: âHollywood stars have higher break-up and divorce rates than the rest of us because of the pressure of being in the public eye.â*
All of which to say: no, you donât need to break up with your boyfriend because Molly-Mae did, or Jennifer Lopez did, or Maya Jama did. Love is still real. (I promise).
Everyone Just Needs To Leave Chappell Roan The Fuck Alone, Please
This month, Chappell Roan spoke directly to her camera â and her fans â in a plea for privacy.*
In the video, she said: âI donât care that [stalking/harassment of celebrities] is normal ⊠that doesnât make it okay.â
She goes on: âItâs weird that you think you know a person just cause you see them online and you listen to the art they make. Thatâs fucking weird.â
Itâs such a refreshing phrase: that just because somethingâs ânormalâ doesnât mean it should be.
How is that we condone stalking/harassment as harmless âfanâ behaviour, when what it really is a gross invasion of privacy? The answer to this would require days of research and an in-depth understanding of how fan culture developed, in tandem with the paparazzi and the expansion of the internet over the past decade. But what I will say, is this: we are living in unprecedented times. Never before have celebrities been so easily contacted; never before have we expected so much of them.
They appear on our screens, in real-time: on glitchy live-streams or TikTok videos. They have never been closer. We can almost touch them. Almost.
If youâve read any of my work, you probably know that Iâm all for the pop-culture-political-crossover (because I think itâs generally a positive thing), but itâs also a clear exemplification of just how much we expect from our favourite celebrities: there is no domain in which they are not held to (incredibly high) standards.
They need to be online, all the time. They need to produce more work; they need to support the causes we support, and not the ones we donât. We made you famous, we remind them, if they do something we donât like. We pay your bills. You wouldnât be anywhere if it werenât for us.
Let us be very clear: we love you, until we hate you. And thereâs a very, very thin line between the two.
In the latest episode of Everything is Content, Oenone, Ruchira, and Beth talk about this phenomenon: how celebrity culture oscillates, in 2024, between two extremes: we idolise and despise our celebrities, at the same time.
Of gossip columns, they make another excellent point: all those who criticise are so much more âclued upâ about what the influencer/celeb is doing than the average âfanâ is. They are fan-turned-hater.
Taylor Swift sings about this phenomenon in her song âBut Daddy I Love Himâ: speaking of her âfansâ, she says âI just learned these people try and save you, cause they hate you.â The song is widely speculated to have been written about Taylorâs brief relationship with Matty Healy, when her so-called fans wrote an âopen letterâ* to the singer, demanding she stop dating him. They love her so much, it turns to a kind of overprotected, internalised hatred. She can only be theirs; and when she acts in a way that is obviously not condoned by them, they turn against her. Itâs all so fucking dystopian.
Iâve read some really incredible writing on this subject, from artists who have experienced their own moments of fame, and the descriptions are terrifying. I implore you to read them: Chappell Roan doesnât owe you shit (by Lauren Hough), and The Eeriness of Fame by Eliza McLamb. Â
Lest us forget: Our favourite artists are individuals with beautiful, messy, complex lives. Yes, they may create brilliant art, but we are not entitled to a single scrap of their attention. And that is how it should be.
âUgh, Everything Is The Sameâ: Okay, but is that a bad thing?
For The Guardian, Rebecca Nicholson wrote a piece titled: âThe big idea: are we all beginning to have the same taste?â
Focussing on uniformity in the music industry, Nicholson writes about her experience of seeing The Sugababes and the history-making phenomenon of The Eras Tour. Let me add one more to her roster: Oasis. The band hadnât announced its comeback when she wrote the piece, but this weekend itâs all anyoneâs talking about.
She writes: âWeâre seeing an increasingly samey musical landscape, in which taste has become trapped in a feedback loop of the algorithmâs making.â
Of writing on Substack, Emily Sundbergâs piece recently argued the same thing:
âI realized that if you blacked out the names of many of the writers I come across on Substack today, I wouldnât be able to tell them apart [âŠ] Substack is making everyone into writers the same way Instagram made everyone into photographers.â
And you could say the same thing about fashion. An ongoing romanticisation of the 90s and 00s (baggy jeans, oversized sweatshirts, Rachel from Friends or Meg Ryan in Nora Ephron Films as style inspiration) leads to a flattening of sartorial expression: everyone looks the same.
In Dazed, Kleigh Balugo links the relative stasis of fashion over the past 20 years to that of culture, citing a viral TikTok video, which itself cites academics Mark Fisher and Marc Augé:
âFashion and art havenât changed in almost 30 years because since⊠the early 90s weâve basically been trapped in the same exact neoliberal, late capitalist system the whole time [âŠ] The same financial institutions, studios, heads of fashion and even musicians have basically been popular and on top of the industries theyâve been in since the 90s.â
At the same time, we all want to escape. To get offline. To return to print magazines and flip phones: the golden era of â oh, right, yes, - the 90s or early 00s. When the internet was a way to explore the world as opposed to hide from it.
Earlier this week, The New Yorker published a piece about the âGlobal Oat Milk Eliteâ, in which they interview â and analyse â some of the most popular âalternativeâ Instagram meme-accounts across the world.
It focusses on one of the curators â Jonas Kooyman â of havermelkelite (Dutch for âOat Milk Eliteâ) who started the account after noticing a trend:
âWithin a couple of months, maybe seventy or eighty per cent of the people before me in lineâthey would start ordering oat milk instead of regular milkâ â a way to âproject a certain image to the outside worldââa conscientious consumerism and a cosmopolitan good taste.â
So: everyone is the same. Everyone listens to the same music (Taylor Swift, Chappell Roan, Oasis), everyone wears the same clothes (white blouses with bows on them, Adidas Sambas, huge scrunchies, bright red accessories, oversized jumpers with bold lettering), everyone watches the same TikTok videos and complains about not being able to kick their TikTok addiction. Everyone watches Baby Reindeer â and then the Piers Morgan interview about Baby Reindeer â and comes to the same conclusion (it was unethical; it was good TV). Everyone watches The Olympics whilst eating crisps on their sofa. Even the counterculture is homogenous: oat milk lattes, micro fringes, vintage shops, thrifted mirrors with gilt frames, Birkenstock clogs, reading Joan Didion with old-school-wired-headphones on public transport.
Last week, I wrote a piece about how it feels to squash oneself, as a writer, into an algorithmic ânicheâ in order to find an audience in 2024. Because everythingâs the same, right?
Who is the real villain here? Oh, I know! â social media. Itâs always social media, isnât it? That flattening, hungry thing that envelops you and spits you out feeling terrible about yourself.
Or could that be too simplistic?
Is it that we all love the same things because those things are⊠well, really good? Is it that there have always been super-hyper popular things, at every point in history, and weâre just feeling it particularly keenly right now, post-pandemic, when everyone is trying to grab onto life and squeeze it with all their might?
Maybe. Itâs hard to tell.
But what I will say, is this. Firstly: I love how much people love the same things. It adds a layer of excitement, of easy conversation, dropping âvery demure, very mindfulâ into a conversation and watching eyes light up. Secondly: I actually donât think everythingâs the same. Each year, I find new music that sounds totally different (to me, anyway). Each year, I find new ways to express myself through fashion; and see people online, and in real life, expressing their individuality in completely different ways. Each week, I have conversations with people I love â and people I barely know â that make me see the world in a different way. Each day, I read something new: a piece online, or in print, or a book, that makes me think: no, things arenât homogenous. Yes, there are trends, but thereâs so much variability within those trends. So much creativity, so much originality.
Okay, so weâre going through a phase of âfemale protagonists can be angry tooâ, right now, but does that explain â or predict â the ferocity of Eliza Clarkâs writing in Boy Parts? The implicit anger of it, the rage that claws at the page? No. It is unique; wondrously so. It is refreshing. And it is a demonstration of a culture that is seeking new voices; those that arenât always easy to listen to.
Is there really an argument that Charli XCXâs âbratâ is homogenous? Only in that it has dominated cultural (and sort of political) discourse recently. It exists within a tradition, yes, but does it sound the same? No, it doesnât. It reverberates with its own quality; self-loathing, self-love, the urge to party and pass out and do it all over again. The urge to build a beautiful life. The urge to self-destruct. Billie Eilishâs sexy monotone, talking of Charliâs underwear: pull it to the side and get all up in it. The complex âworking outâ of a female friendship on âGirl, So Confusing.â
Which is all to say: perhaps we do have the same taste. But that taste is really quite good. Or, in the words of Charli: Â
Uhhh, the response to the demure trend isnât very demureâŠ
Itâs meant to be a joke. If I see one more piece from about how to âchannel demureâ (be earnest, quiet, shy, mindful as a way to embrace your femininity) â I will SCREAM.
Obsessing
Chrome nails (especially with a pink-green tint).
The album âShort nâ Sweetâ by Sabrina Carpenter.
(Especially how she makes the whole thing about a situationship, just like Taylor Swift did with making TTPD all about a brief relationship break-up as opposed to her break-up of 6 years. Like mother like daughter, eh?).
Toast. Every once in a while, I rediscover toast. Today is one of those days; I will be having it with all of my meals, thank you very much.
Broadchurch. I know, late to the party; again. But still. Olivia Coleman, you are breathtaking.
Love Is Blind. (So many thoughts; let me know if you want to hear them).
Eliza Clark (I devoured both of her books, over the past week. I know Iâm late to the party, but Iâm never going to leave it now).
Finding artists on Instagram. Itâs my new favourite thing. My feed is like a gallery, curated just for me. Itâs wonderful.
Actually using the body wash I save, because life is too short to save it.
Aperol Spritzes (because summer is almost over).
Pesto and cheese sandwiches (if you know, you know).
Green tea.
TEXTS
As ever, Iâll only recommend pieces/books I really love â not just everything Iâve read. Here goes.
Penance by Eliza Clark is a masterpiece, and I donât say that lightly. Itâs for anyone who loves true crime, gritty gen-z voices and/or Atonement by Ian McEwan (I love all three).
The Guest by Emma Cline is slow-paced and magical. Her writing is so evocative, so surprising, so entrancing. I devoured it.
This piece in The New Yorker about friendships will make you feel held, and seen, and normal (in the best way).
Anne Enright: I love you. Hereâs a piece I adore, about her experience being on tour as a writer.
And this short story will draw you in and pull you out, tide-like. Itâll make you wish it were longer.
This poem, Dear Reader, by Kim Addonizio is everything I wish I could write.
On writing and reading: this piece on Literary Fiction and Plot by Heather Parry is wonderful, as is this piece by Elif Batuman, in which one of my favourite writers in the WORLD writes about Beautiful World, Where Are You by Sally Rooney, after listening to it (yes, listening!) for the first time. Itâs meta, itâs sharp, itâs brilliant.
Educated By
This piece about Swifties for Kamala shows the power of pop-cultural-political-crossover (inspiring, tbh). Â
If youâre not sure whatâs going on with Blake Lively and It Ends With Us, right now (youâre not the only one), this podcast episode is a great explainer.
This marriage therapist talks about the most frequent conflicts in a relationship â and how to cope with them.
And, finally, this piece about Why AI Isnât Going To Make Art. Thank goodness.
Saved:
And so August slips away like a bottle of wine as the world slowly tips us into autumn. Thereâs something so fresh about September: it feels more like the new year than the new year does. An opportunity to re-invent. To line fresh notebooks with fresh ideas. To reclaim this year, that might feel as though itâs been running from you. To remind yourself that this is your life; that you can do whatever you want with it. (Yes: you).
And because of all these things (and also because itâs fun), Iâm re-naming the season. Welcome to Lit Girl Fall.*
Lit girl fall is for those who find great joy in simple things (cinnamon-spiced lattes, finding an antique copy of your favourite novel); for the grown-up Tumblr âthought daughtersâ who read The Bell Jar once and never looked back, because it made them feel seen, and inspired, and also slightly self-indulgent. Itâs for those for whom the album âREDâ is almost a religion (it is â quite literally â holy ground). Itâs for reading bell hooks as the rain patters and the candles flicker and articulating the thought â even if itâs just in your own notes app â that you are the adult your teenage self aspired to be. Hereâs a playlist just for you, a Pinterest Board to feed your inspiration, and a complete âHow to Romanticise Septemberâ guide.
I hope, this month, you read a really good book and make yourself a really great coffee and sit with your bent feet under you, watching the rain outside your window. I hope you treat yourself with kindness, with compassion, and with the strength to hold fast to your dreams.
Paid subs â Iâll see you next week (and let me know what youâd like me to write about in the chat!). Also, Iâm gifting a few paid subs this month, to say thank you to this gorgeous community. If you - or someone you know - would love a subscription but isnât in the right financial position right now, message me and Iâll gift you one.
Until next month,
Hannah xxx
*Footnote 1: From Cosmopolitan UK: âA study by the Marriage Foundation found that 40% of celebrities divorced within a 10-year period, yet the UK national average for divorce in the first decade is 20%. Throw in long-distance travel, conflicting schedules, and differing career priorities, and itâs far from a fairy tale.â
*Footnote 2: Iâm sure you probably already know who she is, but for those of you who havenât heard of her, sheâs a singer-songwriter who has shot to meteoric fame in the past six months or so.
*Footnote 3: They wrote: âyour voice holds tremendous power and right now your silence is palpable,â adding, âwe urge you to reflect on the impact of your own and your associatesâ behaviour.â
*Footnote 4: I just wrote an entire essay about how these aesthetics arenât real; theyâre curated, two-dimensional, and unrealistic. But theyâre also beautiful, and theyâre kind of crucial when it comes to romanticising the mundane. So take Lit Girl Fall with a pinch of salt. Right now, Iâm writing this on my sofa, hair scraped back in a greasy bun, second coffee perched beside me because Iâm on a deadline, and also at the tale-end of a migraine, so writing looks less like Carrie Bradshaw, today, and more like rat-girl-frenzied-writing-fuelled-by-toast-and-coffee. Such is life.
May I just say that âeverything is the sameâ only works IMO if you live in a big city where everybodyâs chronically online, or if you go to school/college. I personally find that NOBODY around me knows of the huge scrunchies or the bright red accessories (or others trends) ⊠And I believe that we tend to consider our online bubble like the only existing one, when around us there is still a lot of diversity. While you make a good point about certain things, I feel like we (and I absolutely do include myself in this) should just try to put the TikTok trends into their context ; a lot of them donât really bleed into reality âen masseâ like we tend to see online. I donât know if Iâm the only one feeling like this ?
Maybe I sound bitter and Iâm sorry if thatâs the case ; I actually really enjoy reading your thoughts, Hannah ! Thank you for the second amazing newsletter of the day :).
i agree with everything you just said. i have to say however that i didnât expect max to make it on your newsletter because iâm not british and have never heard of these people (i havenât watched love island) but this seems indeed very important for all the fiat 500 fake tan girlies and iâm invested